http://www.nikonchat.com/ken-rockwell-nikkor/
I am a student of photojournalism. I buy Nikkor AF 24-85mm f/2.8-4 Nikon 24-85mm and f3.5-4.5g?
photozone.de recommended to go with the more expensive lens 2.8, while Ken Rockwell.com says the 3.5 to 4.5 is much better quality. What is more appropriate for the work of photojournalism?
Ken Rockwell does not is an expert photographer or product tester. Not even decent in any of these activities. He is, however, an expert in publishing outrageous claims generated traffic and advertising revenue. Have you read the warning on its About page? "While often inspired by real products and events, as any other good news organization, I like doing things and stretch the truth if they make a fun article. In the case of new products, rumors and nonsense normal, everything is a lie. If you lack a good BS detector, please treat this entire site as a work of fiction. "Here are some appropriate comments to two lenses you're thinking – and do not know, agree with photozone.de: http://www.naturfotograf.com/lens_zoom_01.html # AF24-85f2.8 The two previous answers were excellent, too. I personally use a Nikon D200 with 17-55mm f / 2.8. In a 24 mm sensor would not be cut wide enough for my taste.
Nikon News