http://www.nikonchat.com/nikkor-35mm-1-8-af-s-2/
Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 35 mm f / 1.8?
I was watching this goal and was wondering what you think? I know it's a little hard to find, but its relatively low cost. Do you think I should do? Do not have VR (or is for lovers of the canyon) to be a problem? What do you think? Or go the same amount in the SB-600. Right now I have a D60 with a 18-55 f/3.something VR and 55-200 VR. So I think this would be the logical choice of the next target. Thank you! Dan The flash is quite good I do not much only use it for fill flash. I was looking at this cover for events and parties in low light. Theres pros and cons I guess this in front of a flash. Flash is large and heavy, need batteries, but more versatile. this objective is sharp, fast, and light, but I will help, only in low light. with SB-600 i could use it in the dark. well. Flash gets sick sooner or later. the only question I want first. this goal or flash?)
I'd rather have the flash / The 35 mm is a popular focal point, but it is covered by the kit lens. IMO, the following step is the flash or a tripod. You will be amazed at the clarity and be able to stop the movement. Course with a 35 mm f1.8 can shoot low light, but still is difficult to try to get good shots of people. You're fighting hand shake and subject movement. It's not like you can not do, but the flash will much more rewarding.
Matt Bradshaw of Electric Duane opening set HD 720p filmed using the Nikon D5000
Nikon News