http://www.nikonchat.com/nikkor-35mm-1-8-af-s/
Nikon D3100, the question of the lens?
I was thinking of just getting the body and http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D3100-Digital-Camera-Body/dp/B004ALFV5Y/ref=sr_1_19?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1306112269&sr=1-19 Nikon D3100 save money that would be achieved on the lens kit for two, Nikon 35mm F/1.8 (for low light / everywhere) http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-35mm-AF-S- digital -Cameras/dp/B001S2PPT0 And Nikon 18-55mm f/3.5 (macro) http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-18-55mm-3-5-5-6G-AF-S-Nikkor/dp/B000ZMCILW is a good idea? are the two lenses of a loss money? lens will do the work of others, that is, I should only buy one or the other? I shoot in low light, and the street. a landscape, but not great number of portraits. please help me make the most of my money
It's a great idea. Many professional photographers "overlap" of coverage the lens, some objects that can do things that one, zoom range, you can not. For example, usually a bundle of 18-200 mm Nikon f/3.5 – 5.6G VR, 35 mm f/1.8G AF-S 18-50mm f/2.8 Tamron, Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM and 50mm f/1.8 Nikkor for most tasks. You will notice quite a coincidence, but get best results with specialized tools. Indeed, the 18-55mm f/3.5 (I have one of those too), not a macro. A real macro lens (or "micro" Nikonspeak) would be an AF-S Micro NIKKOR 60mm f/2.8G ED, or the equivalent Sigma / Tamron / Tokina. Here is a list of objectives that the autofocus on the D3100. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nikon_compatible_lenses_with_integrated_autofocus-motor Hope this helps.
Nikon News