http://www.nikonchat.com/nikkor-75mm/
Is it worth jumping to this goal?
im planning to sell my Nikkor 18-200mm VR and buy a new Tamron AF 28-75mm f / 2.8 or Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 EX DG HSM? most outdoor shots, landscapes .. What do you think?
If injected into most landscapes, I hope you are interested in angle lens (ultra) wide. If you currently use the 18-200mm VR, which means that you are using a Nikon DX camera. That would make the Nikon 12-24mm obvious choice. Both of the lenses you're thinking now offer wide coverage angle less than its current target (the 28-75mm is hardly wide-angle coverage after that the crop factor of 1.5.) For me, that makes them less suitable for landscape photography. And you had to pay a deposit for the constant primium f / 2.8 … which is great for many applications, but adds nothing to the landscape photography. For landscapes that should stop the lens down, at least at f / 8. When you stop lenses in this lot, even paying off the field in terms of image quality. A $ 1000 lens that shines in 2.8 still shine at f / 8 … a goal of $ 300 that is soft at f / 4 also tack sharp at f / 8. So these are two great lenses, but in my humble opinion do not make sense for their intended purpose. The 24-70mm lens can make a good general use, however. Just check how often you use the 18-24mm range at the current zoom. I use a Nikon D200 and personally I need something that starts at 18 mm. A 24-xx lens would be perfect if I had a complete picture of Nikon D700 or D3 camera … but not me. (I do not see the point of buying camera lenses I have no / no I have for several years. I need glasses I can use now.)
Nepali song shot in Bremen(Germany) with English/ German/ Korean subtitles
Nikon News