http://www.nikonchat.com/nikkor-af-s-55-200mm-vr/
Is this a good lens Nikon d90 nikon AF-S DX VR Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED IF Zoom Target Value Package?
please let me know if a bad or good lens?
In terms of value, I've seen the packages offered, or rather have seen a package that includes a Nikon body, the 18-55 and 55-200 VR VR, but generally a smaller body like the D60. If only the 55-200, which is really too long a goal to be a package that could be used practically. While I agree that both lenses are considered "good" lenses with the D90 I would opt for a more robust as the 18-200 VR lens or the 16-85 VR, because both the 18-55 and 55-200 VR lenses are cheaper in the level of build quality that I like and not against the intensive use. I've been through a couple of kit lenses, both 18 to 55 and from 18 to 135 is used in an environment of very humid and hot temperature. I've used both the 16-85 and 18-200 VR lens and now own the 16-85 and may attest to its image quality, viewing angle and quality of construction as a standard zoom you can use in most conditions. And I have left on my D80, in my trunk in summer heat of Georgia without problems, which I'm afraid the 18-55 and 18-135 can not handle. So here's the thing Yes, 18 to 55 and 200 mm VR Lens-55 are good, in which they work and give good enough results in the way of image quality – however, they are ideal for people who use them in an environment recreation or the environment and does not really require much more than what they buy. I will recommend that if you are going to invest in the D90, with which is a step up from the kind of camera people usually get mentioned, you might want to consider more of an investment in higher quality lenses. When leaving the range of $ 150 200 and in the range of $ 500-600, the quality is better – believe me.
Nikon News