http://www.nikonchat.com/nikon-d90-camera-kits/
Nikon D90 or Canon 7D?
I have a nikon d40x with kit lens. I was thinking of switching to either D90 or 7D. or I could just get a new lens of F1.4. I recommend? New f/1.4 lens? Nikon D90 + Lens F1.4? Canon 7D + f1.4 lens? I know these cameras are different in price and performance, I just need know what you would if you were in my shoes? Thank you. video functionality is a great advantage, in fact I bought a Kodak Zi8 (which only served as a camera pocket) and got rid of it hoping to get D90 or 7D. but I rented the 50mm f/1.4 and it was great so I doubt update. So 7D is better in the long term even with the higher price tag? I have just the kit lens, but I tried nikon 50mm f/1.4 lens is amazing IMO. Shot in the PA and the manual mode, but I use the auto from time to time.
The answer depends largely on your skill level and what they want or need from the new camera and / or new lens. I can say that regardless of how you use the camera, I do not update the body of the camera to a midrange or high-end camera APS-C format, unless you've already updated to something other than the kit lenses and / or found the camera is somehow impeding the flow of work as a photographer. You have not said what focal length the goal that you plan to buy, so I can not really comment on this beyond the following. A 50mm f/1.4 on a DSLR APS-C format is a lens great picture and works well in low light. A 28 mm f/1.8 or 30 mm f/1.4 would be a good "normal" lenses for low light work in a format digital SLR APS-C. And finally, an f1.8 lens, f1.4 or 85 mm is ideal for indoor sports, if a 70-200mm f2.8 zoom is not fast enough. In the cameras, unless you strip in the manual, aperture / shutter priority and programmed exposure mode, the camera is doing almost all the work for you and you do not slow down in every way. When shooting in these modes, you must manually set the aperture, shutter speed, exposure compensation, ISO and white balance. So the second command dial and dedicated additional controls offered by the more advanced cameras becomes an advantage for those who often make adjustments. If they are not doing things, even a relatively minor upgrade of the D90 offers few tangible benefits. 7D cameras like the Canon cameras are basically the level professional who lack the special scene modes are on cameras like the D90 or D40x. So, if you do not have at least a basic knowledge of control exposure, these cameras will be difficult to use to its full potential and therefore would be a huge waste of money. The 7D offers a fully automatic mode, but the camera and has the same capacity and the final image produced is not substantially better. One additional note on the 7D (I have one). This can be a much more expensive you may already know that Canon and Nikon cameras and lenses are not compatible cross. In other words, you and is an action game with Nikon Nikon lenses and you should probably consider D300s or D300 instead of the 7D. Thoughts deadline of the D300s against 7D. I have already mentioned the additional costs involve the change of lens systems. So its value, I just went through this same debate. I threw the Nikon D300s Canon 7D and side by side for two weeks. The D300s is as good as the Canon 7D. In fact, it is still D300s 7D better than in some respects, particularly with respect to its autofocus system. I love my 7D much and I will not switch to Nikon for a while but if I were a Nikon shooter, I like to buy the D300/D300s time before considering the move to Canon.
Nikon D90 Unboxing video
Nikon News