http://www.nikonchat.com/nikon-f3-camera-body/
What about Nikon lenses?
I was looking over the two new lenses Nikon released the 10-24mm f3.5-4.5 and 35mm F1.8. My question is Are these lenses really necessary? The Nikon 12-24mm lens covers approximately the same focal length, has a fixed aperture, and is better built from what I hear. The 12-24mm can also be found at the same price as the new 10-24mm. 35mm f1.8, the DX is cut, so it is incompatible with 35-mm SLR camera or a camera body FX. Does Nikon make a mistake with these two lenses? Or am I exaggerating.
Really? The image circle produced by the f/1.8 35mm is DX? Yes that's crazy. Hmmm … I suppose you're right. http://www.nikon.com/about/news/2009/0209_nikkor_01.htm Nikon has sold millions of APS-C digital SLR cameras and I hope the format will be supported in the coming years. Get used to it I guess. *** The 10-24mm f / 3.5 is for people who have a decent budget but not plan to move to FX in the short term. That is a precision target market destination. Not for me or you really are. Indeed, in such focal short lengths the difference between 10mm and 12mm is quite pronounced.
Cameras of Wagon Attack 2
Nikon News