http://www.nikonchat.com/nikon-image-stabilization-lenses/

Camera Does it "feels better" if …?
Does it matter which camera to buy has the best feel to it has never used a digital SLR before? I love how the Nikon has a thumb wheel, it only makes sense to me but having no knowledge embedded in Me, I'm sure that could change. But, I also want a camera with image stabilization, and I have two Canon lenses that have given me, so could only buy the body 350 and end once and for much cheaper than any other route (and have a great camera). I'm so confused. I can save money and get the 350 (I very bad), get the little light that I getting an IS (Sony looks good), or get the "feel" good and have less than the Canon camera for the same price. What should I do! I know that no matter the camera, the image that people see, but I want the one I can get! The Canon lenses I have are not their IS. But I would a camera with IS. So the bottom line is feeling, IS, or price
IMO, you are between a rock and a hard place. Common sense says "Buy a body of Canon already has a pair of glasses now. "His desire to image stabilization, that neither you or Canon lenses body, says" Buy a Sony A300 or A350 and enjoy the IS in the camera. "Here is a other things to consider about Sony. The A300 and A350 has Live View that actually works with the AF. If you have to hold the camera overhead for the screen shot tilts down. If you are using the camera at ground level, the screen tilts upward. In addition, the Sony Alpha Series can use every Minolta Maxxum AF lens made since 1985 legacy – with IS and AF. In addition, Sony is launching a line of Carl Zeiss lenses for enjoying its line of SLR digital. IMO, like a camera "feels" in hand is something to consider. A very long time ago, after a couple of years of using a Minolta SRT-202, a friend showed me his Olympus OM-1. It was a tiny camera compared to my 202 brick and was not "good."
I Buy Nikon D3100 Cheap Nikon D3100